"If you were Danish or Swedish, things would have been different"
At times, when I contemplate this autoethnography, despite the struggles I try to reveal, my heart is filled with the sense of peacefulness and hope. Perhaps no one who practices extreme minimalism or teaches post-growth thinks that they are on their own changing everything and bringing about a genuinely sustainable society. Like myself, most realise their own limitations, and see their actions as a small contribution to change in social structures and systems. Apart from this small contribution, there are aesthetic and spiritual aspects of extreme minimalism. In my experience, it is a beautiful lifestyle. Living this way is calming and allows me to dedicate my energy to many other spaces.
Overall, it's been pleasant to practise extreme minimalism, and pleasant to write about it. Initially, in my autoethnographic writing I was going to focus on the material aspects of this mode of being. Then naturally the spiritual and social aspects demanded my attention. Writing about the social aspects, especially when they concern struggles against powerful structures, is more challenging, since it refers to and evokes feelings of pain, fear, distress, and anxiety.
Sustainability is all about being in the world differently or harmoniously with the self, human and non-human others, and nature. For my partner and co-author, at the heart of genuine sustainability are gentleness and care. Oppression, harassment, unfair treatment, discrimination and so on are not in line with sustainability. Though it might be assumed that this goes without saying, I believe it needs to be said again and again. It is especially so because these ugly and toxic attitudes and behaviours keep manifesting themselves. Or, to say it more accurately, they are enacted intentionally by those in positions of power within structures that empower them even further.
I find it important to document my experiences. Over the years, there have been many toxic situations that I either experienced or witnessed, but in this entry I will document the experiences as I lived through them since the end of 2022. I will not disclose any names.
I left a northern Swedish university in the end of 2022. There were several reasons for it. I wrote all the works that I wanted to write in northern Sweden, and I wanted to be closer to the fellow humans I was writing with at that time and with whom I'm writing with currently. They were based in southern Finland, Denmark, and southern Sweden. Some part of me also began to miss a milder climate and sunlight, though I fell in love with northern Sweden and its nature.
When I relocated to southern Finland, my now-manager wanted to meet in person informally a few days before I started at my new university. She seemed very friendly. My now-partner joined part of the meeting as he was in Helsinki at that time. Him and I were working on a book and an article together. The meeting went well and I was looking forward to starting a new chapter in my academic journey.
There were three things I learned when I started at my current university. One was that many fellow humans in the research group I was loosely part of were incredibly unhappy. Another thing was that the manager, before I was offered the job, asked a fellow human, a PhD student, to find information about my family and not tell anyone about it. And the third thing was that the organisation is very hierarchical. One of my fellow humans at work mentioned that the organisation's management style is old-fashioned, but this presence of hierarchy I felt myself immediately after being in Sweden where hierarchies in academia exist but feel milder. Hierarchical structure disempowers those in temporary and precarious positions and empowers those in positions of power.
I work on my own research, do not co-author with the manager, and she is not my mentor. Once a fellow human at work asked me how I could work with this manager, and my response was that I simply was not working with her and was working together with fellow humans in other countries and universities. I brought my own research to the university, something that was missing from their teaching and publications. Even though the manager claimed that they had been teaching post-growth for many years, they lacked this expertise in their department. In fact, many Finnish post-growth scholars did their PhD in that department but none of them stayed.
Months went by. The manager's style came across to me as micromanaging. She would send emails on Sundays and late evenings. Perhaps because I wasn't working closely with her, I overlooked much toxicity. At the same time, I empathised with others' bad experiences. I hope that they will tell their own stories.
Something I found unusual was her calling the tasks others in the research group performed as "help". It felt disrespectful and hierarchical, since such "help" was not help at all, but time-consuming tasks she told people to do.
In the end of winter I decided to write my own book. I'd been doing research on degrowth business since 2016, and it was time to collect all my knowledge, reflections, and thoughts in one place. The book would focus on the places where I dwell and that had deep meaning to me. The places are Denmark, Finland, and Sweden, the three Nordic countries where I've either lived (Sweden and Finland) or was going to spend time in (Denmark). I told the manager about the book and mentioned that I would collect more data in all these three countries. She didn't seem to have an issue with this, but she did say that books don't count and that I would need to focus on writing papers and not books.
Because I had so many ongoing projects, I was working days, evenings and weekends. A colleague who was unhappy in that research group left, and I inherited the admin side of the online course he was running. Before he left, he told me that the course takes around 10 hours per month but it would take even more time for me since I was not yet familiar with the system.
My now-partner and I decided to be together in the end of May. I worked all summer apart from a few days when my partner and I could meet. When everyone began to return from the summer break, I saw the manager and mentioned briefly to her the news about my relationship. Initially, she seemed supportive but at the same time made strange, rude and inappropriate comments. She asked me if I had someone to go for lunch with, and I said no. We went to get lunch together. She said that I need to be extra careful as a "Russian woman" (I'm Jewish and a British citizen which she knew well) since, according to her, there is an assumption that Russian women want to be with "Western men". She said she had thought that my partner and I have had a love affair since the day in December when she met both of us, and that she had seen such situations before, including when women apparently benefitted from this "situation". She asked me about my living arrangement, to which I said that I would be looking to rent something less expensive in Finland, since being in a long-distance relationship comes with extra costs. She did say that she doesn't need me on site though.
I will never forget the comment she made to me, which was "if you were Danish or Swedish, things would have been different".
I reminded her about my book on Danish, Finnish, and Swedish businesses.
Right after that, she called the HR and told them that I was going to relocate to Denmark, quit my residence in Finland, and that she had doubts about my plan's legality. I came to see an HR person and explained that I was writing a book about Danish etc. businesses, and that I had a contract with a publisher. The HR person said they knew nothing about the book. There are two ways that my university allows researchers to work from abroad, one is short-term (up to 30 days) and one long-term. The HR wrote an email to me stating that if research can be done in Finland, then it must be done in Finland, and that I can go to Denmark for 2-3 weeks only as permitted by the manager. It feels important to say that in that department, many go on long-term research stays, and many work remotely.
I had a meeting with the manager where she said that I should keep in touch with my partner via technology, that he needs to take a break after his previous relationship, that if he wants to see me he needs to come to Finland, and that I can see him on the weekends or during holidays. She knew well that his contract is mostly teaching (while mine is 90% research) and he has care responsibilities in Denmark. In the end, she said that my "plan to be in Denmark is not going to work" (the first time she saw the plan was later). I yet again reminded her of my book and said I needed to be in Denmark and Sweden for research. She said "let's be honest". Then she claimed that she wanted to help me get access to Finnish businesses. This is something she promised many times but never did. I didn't follow up on that because I could reach out to Finnish businesses myself.
My initial reaction was to leave. But then I decided to address this situation. I wrote to the HR manager and my manager's manager. I went to see occupational healthcare. The psychologist diagnosed me with severe depression and anxiety due to this situation, and the GP prescribed me some medication as well as signed a sick leave certificate. Interestingly (and shockingly), when I tried to discuss these diagnoses with HR, the HR manager said that what I discuss with a psychologist is personal, and that the psychologist can't advise the university what to do. According to the law in Finland, one's workplace must provide a safe work environment for humans, and the HR manager's unwillingness to hear about them failing to do so was, in my view, unacceptable.
There were two meetings with HR and my manager's boss. During one meeting my 3.5 week plan to go to Denmark and Sweden was approved. Anyone doing place-based research on business knows that this is not enough. During the second meeting, I wanted to bring the managers' attention to inappropriate comments. Not only did my manager not apologise, but she said I was not doing my job based on an unanswered email. She said she only wanted to "help" as I am "Russian and new to the Nordics", knowing well that my closest colleagues are in the Nordics, I've lived in the Nordics for 2 years, and Russia is a place where I was born and lived, but is only a small part of my life's journey. She also said that my partner and I met when he was still married, as if it was relevant. The HR manager sided with my manager and claimed that since I am in Finland, I should be studying Finnish businesses. During the same meeting the HR manager tried to silence me by saying that I cannot discuss this situation with others.
Yet another interesting comment my manager made was that "community" was important to her and that she wanted me to be present. The HR manager tried to reinforce this point. This comment about community went against both what my manager said just a few days before that (she didn't need me in Finland), and the state of the so-called community.
There was another meeting with my manager and her manager during which my manager delegated grading two papers of 150 students exactly during the time I was going to be in Denmark. Her manager asked her how she felt about being removed from my supervision and replaced by someone else, and she said she would speak to HR, meaning, in my view, that she refused to retain power over me. Before the meeting, she emailed my former colleague to inquire how long it took to register students' credits in the university's system for the online course I was administering. The former colleague responded and said it took 2 hours. During the meeting she claimed that this is how much time a course takes. Anyone in academia who administers courses knows that registering students' credits is only one, perhaps the least time-consuming, part of running a course. She also wanted a right to assign "tasks not otherwise specified" as she claimed that I am doing less than others. I believe that she knew that I worked much more than my standard hours, and wanted to make me feel bad via claiming that I worked less.
The most memorable moment of the meeting was her saying that she didn't want my "help" anymore with a course she was running and that I should assist someone else. It was memorable because the title of the course was related to sustainability, and her behaviour was anything but in line with sustainability. It was only aimed at sustaining her own power.